Carlos Ruiz-Romero v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 8, 202219-72971California677 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 8 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS ENRIQUE RUIZ-ROMERO, No. 19-72971

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-888-743

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 1, 2022**

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Enrique Ruiz-Romero, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture (“CAT”), and denying his motion to remand.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.