Andrew Alles v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 8, 202218-73315California423 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 8 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW WINSTON ALLES; No. 18-73315

BERNADETTE ALOMA ALLES,

Agency Nos. A075-635-301 Petitioners, A075-639-417

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 6, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Andrew Winston and Bernadette Aloma Alles, natives and citizens of Sri

Lanka, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision

denying their untimely and numerically barred motion to reopen their immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). proceedings. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them

here, except as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.