Ortiz

Ortiz v. City of Santa Clarita CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 9, 2022B301734California6,127 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 6/9/22 Ortiz v. City of Santa Clarita CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

SANDRA ORTIZ, B301734

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC608663) v.

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Monica Bachner, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Haik Beloryan and Haik Beloryan for Plaintiff and Appellant. Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Brian I. Hamblet, Kane Thuyen and Rodolfo Aguado III for Defendant and Respondent.

______________________ Sandra Ortiz appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted the summary judgment motion filed by the City of Santa Clarita (City). Ortiz was hit by a vehicle while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.