Nicandro Sanchez-Patron v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 202221-70950California877 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 9 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICANDRO SANCHEZ-PATRON, No. 21-70950

Petitioner, Agency No. A072-868-338

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 7, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Nicandro Sanchez-Patron1 petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 In a declaration attached to his motion to reopen, Sanchez-Patron stated that his name is “Ricardo” and that he has two aliases, “Nicandro Sanchez Patrón” and “Ricardo Aquino.” decision denying his motion to reopen a deportation order from 1994. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.