Azucena Lopez Cedillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 202219-71758California351 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 9 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AZUCENA LOPEZ CEDILLO, No. 19-71758

Petitioner, Agency No. A079-786-754

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Immigration Judge’s Decision

Submitted June 2, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, KOH, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Azucena Lopez Cedillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) that

she did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in Mexico and thus is

not entitled to relief from her reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review an IJ’s negative reasonable fear determination for

substantial evidence.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.