People v. Nash CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 9, 2022E076768California8,861 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/9/22 P. v. Nash CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E076768

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF2002177)

LAWRENCE ANTHONY NASH, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Charles J. Koosed, Judge.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for resentencing.

Michael Allen, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney

General, A. Natasha Cortina, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Steve Oetting and

Warren J. Williams, Deputy Attorneys General, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.