People v. Ramirez CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 2022H043461MCalifornia19,801 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/9/22 P. v. Ramirez CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H043461

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 211412)

v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

ALEJANDRO RAMIREZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

It is ordered that the opinion filed on May 17, 2022, be modified as follows: On page 42, in the third full paragraph, beginning with “Between the prosecutor’s argument …[,]” delete the word “extortion” and insert “exaction” in its place, so that the sentence reads as follows: Between the prosecutor’s argument and the jury instructions referenced by the trial court in its response to the jury’s question, there was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.