Stephen May v. David Shinn
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEPHEN EDWARD MAY, Nos. 17-15603 Petitioner-Appellee/ 17-15704 Cross-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:14-cv-00409-
NVW
DAVID SHINN, Director; MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellants/ ORDER Cross-Appellees.
Filed June 10, 2022
Before: Sandra S. Ikuta and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges, and Frederic Block, * District Judge.
Order; Concurrence by Judge Block
* The Honorable Frederic Block, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **
Habeas Corpus / Mandates
Denying Stephen Edward May’s motion to recall a mandate, the panel wrote (1) motions that assert a judgment is void because of a jurisdictional defect generally must show that the court lacked even an arguable basis for jurisdiction, (2) May has not met that standard in arguing that the statutory “in-custody” requirement was satisfied, and (3) the additional details provided in the motion and accompanying exhibits do not demonstrate this Court’s holding…