Diego Mendoza-Garcia v. Merrick Garland
36 F.4th 989
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202220-73583California5,445 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DIEGO MENDOZA-GARCIA, No. 20-73583 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A077-148-170
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted December 9, 2021 San Francisco, California
Filed June 10, 2022
Before: Susan P. Graber and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Jennifer Choe-Groves, * Judge.
Opinion by Judge Choe-Groves
* The Honorable Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. MENDOZA-GARCIA V. GARLAND
SUMMARY **
Immigration
Denying in part and granting in part Diego Mendoza- Garcia’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, the panel held that: (1) first-degree burglary of a dwelling under Oregon Revised Statutes section 164.225 is an aggravated felony; and (2) the BIA misapplied a presumption in determining that Petitioner’s conviction was a particularly serious crime barring withholding of removal.