United States v. Spresim Alimi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202221-35336California569 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-35336

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:16-cr-00028-TMB-1 v.

SPRESIM ALIMI, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 8, 2022** Anchorage, Alaska

Before: HURWITZ, BRESS, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Spresim Alimi appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate his conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. Alimi has not established that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s

alleged failure to explain to him that the seized cash and value of the down

payment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.