Jose Hernandez-Vasquez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202219-72815California697 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE HERNANDEZ-VASQUEZ; No. 19-72815

CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ-MURCIA;

FATIMA HERNANDEZ-MURCIA, Agency Nos. A208-753-236

A208-753-237

Petitioners, A208-753-238

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 8, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Jose Hernandez-Vasquez and his two daughters petition for review

of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the order of an

Immigration Judge denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.