Waterfall Investment Group v. Pivotal Capital Group II CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 2022H048328California751 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lie, J.

Filed 6/10/22 Waterfall Investment Group v. Pivotal Capital Group II CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

WATERFALL INVESTMENT GROUP, H048328, H048928 LLC, (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 19CV348498) Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

PIVOTAL CAPITAL GROUP II, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Plaintiff Waterfall Investment Group, LLC (Waterfall) appeals from (1) the trial court’s order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer by defendant Pivotal Capital Group II, LLC (Pivotal) to Waterfall’s second amended complaint (H048328) and (2) the ensuing order granting Pivotal’s motion for attorney fees and nonstatutory costs as the prevailing party (H048928).2 Waterfall has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.