Alfred Johnson v. Winco Foods, LLC
Opinion
Opinion
Schroeder, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALFRED JOHNSON, individually and No. 21-55501 on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:17-cv-02288-
DOC-SHK
v.
WINCO FOODS, LLC, a Delaware OPINION limited liability company; WINCO HOLDINGS, INC., an Idaho corporation, Defendants-Appellees,
and
DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 4, 2022 Pasadena, California
Filed June 13, 2022 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Sidney R. Thomas, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Schroeder
SUMMARY*
California Employment Law
The panel affirmed the district court’s judgment in favor of WinCo Foods, LLC in a class action brought by Alfred Johnson on behalf of himself and other WinCo employees in California (“plaintiffs”), claiming compensation as an employee for the time and expense of taking a drug test as a successful applicant for employment.