People v. Casillas CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 2022F082848California1,159 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

The legal and procedural requirements for resentencing under section 1170.95 have evolved through both legislative and judicial review of the statutory scheme. As it currently stands and relevant to this case, section 1170.95, subdivision (a) provides: “(a) A person convicted of felony murder or murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine or other theory under which malice is imputed to a person based solely on that person’s participation in a crime, attempted murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine, or manslaughter may file a petition with the court that sentenced the petitioner to have the petitioner’s murder, attempted murder, or manslaughter conviction vacated and to be resentenced on any remaining counts when all of the following conditions apply: “(1) A complaint, information, or indictment was filed against the petitioner that allowed the prosecution to proceed under a theory of felony murder, murder under the natural and probable consequences doctrine or other theory under which malice is imputed to a person based solely on that person’s participation in a crime, or attempted murder under the natural and probable consequences…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.