Paul Amoroso v. Sun Life Assurance Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202221-35801California691 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PAUL AMOROSO, No. 21-35801
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05887-BHS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF
CANADA,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 18, 2022** Seattle, Washington
Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
Dr. Paul Amoroso challenges the district court’s denial of his long-term
disability benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
(“ERISA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Amoroso worked in a supervisory role as a Physician Executive at the