John Ho v. Nick Floutsis

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202220-56017California436 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN HO, an individual, No. 20-56017

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-00472-JLS-JDE v.

NICK FLOUTSIS, in his individual capacity MEMORANDUM* and as trustee of the Floutsis Family Trust; ANGIE FLOUTIS, in her individual capacity and as trustee of the Floutsis Family Trust,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff John Ho appeals the district court’s order declining to exercise

supplemental jurisdiction over his California Unruh Civil Rights Act claim under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4). We lack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.