Henrry Molina Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202216-73926California695 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 13 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HENRRY ALEXANDER MOLINA No. 16-73926

RODRIGUEZ,

Agency No. A073-846-351 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 9, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Henrry Alexander Molina-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.