Fernando Chavez-Guzman v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202220-72943California929 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO ALFONSO CHAVEZ- No. 20-72943

GUZMAN,

Agency No. A208-893-953 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 10, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Fernando Alfonso Chavez-Guzman petitions for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the order of an

Immigration Judge denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

“We review the denial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.