Fernando Chavez-Guzman v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202220-72943California929 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FERNANDO ALFONSO CHAVEZ- No. 20-72943
GUZMAN,
Agency No. A208-893-953 Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 10, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Fernando Alfonso Chavez-Guzman petitions for review of a
decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the order of an
Immigration Judge denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under
8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.
“We review the denial…