Brian Whitaker v. Marylee Reeder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202220-55358California655 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 13 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN WHITAKER, No. 20-55358

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04341-SVW-AFM v.

MARYLEE C. REEDER, in individual and MEMORANDUM* representative capacity as trustee of the Marylee C. Reeder Living Trust; IL FORNAIO (AMERICA) CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; DOES, 1-10,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Brian Whitaker appeals the district court’s order declining to exercise

supplemental jurisdiction over his California Unruh Civil Rights Act claim. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.