Armando Cabello v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 202221-70791California530 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 13 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO MIGUEL CABELLO, No. 21-70791

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-080-966

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 9, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: SCHROEDER and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and ANTOON,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John Antoon II, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. Armando Cabello, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the decision

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) to summarily dismiss his appeal

pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(A), (E) for failure to specify the reasons for

the appeal and for failing to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.