Natareno

Natareno v. Whitlock CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 2022B310060California519 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

Filed 6/13/22 Natareno v. Whitlock CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

MITSY LILIANA NATARENO, B310060

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 20CHRO00648)

DRAKE WHITLOCK,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David A. Rosen, Judge. Appeal dismissed. The Appellate Law Firm and Berangere Allen-Blaine for Defendant and Appellant. Mitsy Liliana Natareno, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent. _______________________________ On October 21, 2020, after multiple hearings, the trial court issued a one-year civil harassment restraining order against Drake Whitlock under Code of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.