Haas

Haas v. Little Love Rescue CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 14, 2022B308898California5,443 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/14/22 Haas v. Little Love Rescue CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from 3citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

ELLIOT HAAS, B308898

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 20STCV20469)

LITTLE LOVE RESCUE et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gregory W. Alarcon, Judge. Affirmed. Pease Law and Bryan Pease for Defendants and Appellants. Housing Equality & Advocacy Resource Team and Dianne Prado for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________________ Elliot Haas, an unhoused individual living on the streets of Los Angeles, sued Brittney Littleton and Little Love Rescue for trespass to chattels,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.