Clemons

Clemons v. Gillespie CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 14, 2022D079382California3,653 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

Filed 6/14/22 Clemons v. Gillespie CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

VAN ROY CLEMONS, JR., D079382

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2020- 00045077-CU-OR-NC)

KIMBERLY GILLESPIE,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert P. Dahlquist, Judge. Affirmed. G10 Galuppo Law and Daniel T. Watts, for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendant and Respondent. Van Roy Clemons, Jr. appeals from an order granting Kimberly Gillespie’s motion to set aside a default judgment against her under Code of

Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b).1 We find no abuse of discretion and affirm the order.

All further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.