Rogelio Gomez-Orozco v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 202217-71836California1,001 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROGELIO SAMUEL GOMEZ-OROZCO, No. 17-71836 a.k.a. Roberto Perez Gonzalez, Agency No. A200-319-766 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 10, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: SCHROEDER and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ANTOON,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Rogelio Samuel Gomez-Orozco (“Gomez-Orozco”), a native and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John Antoon II, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. citizen of Mexico, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”)

decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.