Monica McCarrick v. Janelle Espinoza
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 202220-17311California1,825 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MONICA MCCARRICK, No. 20-17311
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-02652-JKS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JANELLE ESPINOZA,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California James K. Singleton, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 11, 2022 San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, S.R. THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner-Appellant Monica McCarrick appeals from the district court’s
denial of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 2253. We review the district court’s
decision to deny a § 2254 habeas petition de novo and its findings of fact for clear
error, see McClure v. Thompson, 323 F.3d 1233, 1240 (9th Cir. 2003), and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. The Antiterrorism and Effective Death…