Marco Diaz-Arroyo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 202221-70900California636 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 14 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCO DIAZ-ARROYO, No. 21-70900

Petitioner, Agency No. A087-456-055

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 10, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: SCHROEDER and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ANTOON,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John Antoon II, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. Mr. Marco Diaz-Arroyo, a citizen of Mexico, petitions this Court for review

of the denial of his asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”) claims based on the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) negative

reasonable fear determination.

As the IJ…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.