Dwain Lammey v. Plaza Segundo, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 202220-55070California551 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DWAIN LAMMEY, No. 20-55070

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04484-JAK-PLA v.

PLAZA SEGUNDO, LLC, a California MEMORANDUM* Limited Liability Company; DOES, 1-10,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Dwain Lammey appeals the district court’s order

declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his California Unruh Civil

Rights Act (“Unruh Act”) claim, pursuant to the “exceptional circumstances”

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). exception under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.