Satya Neupane v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 202217-70316California519 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 15 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SATYA DEVI NEUPANE, No. 17-70316

Petitioner, Agency No. A088-472-917

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 13, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and WU,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable George H. Wu, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Neupane, a native and citizen of Nepal, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her appeal from an Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.