Enriquez Flores Barrera v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 202217-71362California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 15 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ENRIQUEZ MIGUEL FLORES No. 17-71362

BARRERA,

Agency No. A095-876-862 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 13, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Enriquez Miguel Flores Barrera, a native and citizen of

Guatemala, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision

affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition. Because the

parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.