People v. Fowler CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) counsel has identified possible issues that were considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: 1. Did the trial court err in denying Fowler’s petition for resentencing pursuant to section 1170.18? 2. Did the trial court err in finding that none of the counts were eligible for resentencing under section 1170.18? We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Fowler on this appeal.

The facts of the offenses are not relevant to the questions on this appeal. We will omit a statement of facts. 2

DISPOSITION

The order denying Fowler’s petition for resentencing under section 1170.18 is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

AARON, J.

BUCHANAN, J.

3