In re P.B. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 2022C094137California1,782 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

BACKGROUND

On February 26, 2019, the People filed a juvenile wardship petition alleging the minor, who was then 13 years old, had committed a robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.)1 The minor resolved the petition by admitting an attempted robbery. (§§ 664/221.) According to the stipulated factual basis for the plea, the minor kicked the victim in an attempt to obtain money from her backpack. The juvenile court adjudged the minor a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) and placed him on probation with various terms and conditions, including that he serve 52 days of home confinement with credit for 45 days served, complete 24 hours of community service, and pay a $100 restitution fine. On December 5, 2019, the People filed a second wardship petition alleging that on December 3, 2019, the minor committed a robbery (§ 211—count 1), and that on June 25, 2019, the minor engaged in lewd and lascivious acts upon a child under the age of 14 (§ 288, subd. (a)—count 2), lewd and lascivious acts upon a child under the age of 14 by use of force or fear (§ 288, subd. (b)(1)—count 3), sodomy by force or fear (§ 286, subd. (c)(2)(B)—count 4), and robbery (§ 211—count 5). The juvenile court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.