Wilto Fenescat v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 202220-72643California455 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 16 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILTO FENESCAT, No. 20-72643

Petitioner, Agency No. A209-865-222

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 8, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: GILMAN,*** IKUTA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Wilto Fenescat seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings and to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. reconsider the BIA’s previous decision denying his administrative appeal. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1).

The BIA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.