Roberto Zacapala-Rojas v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 202215-73395California762 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO ZACAPALA-ROJAS, No. 15-73395

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-054-195

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 12, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Robert Zacapala-Rojas (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the order of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.