Robert Luke v. City of Tacoma

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 202221-35440California952 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 16 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT H. LUKE, No. 21-35440

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-05245-BHS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF TACOMA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

FRANK KRAUSE,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 8, 2022** Seattle, Washington

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: GILMAN,*** IKUTA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Robert Luke appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on his

claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Washington state law in favor of individual

defendants Sean Gustason, Mike Ake, and Donald Ramsdell, and municipal

defendants City of Tacoma and City of Tacoma Police Department (TPD). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.