Ibrahin Cutino Espinosa v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 202220-73145California1,485 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IBRAHIN CUTIÑO ESPINOSA, No. 20-73145 Petitioner, Agency No. A213-361-729 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: WATFORD and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and AMON,** District Judge.

Ibrahin Cutiño Espinosa petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision to uphold the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)1 denial of his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Carol Bagley Amon, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. 1 The BIA and the IJ are referred to collectively as “the Agency.” Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.