Erick Valladares v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 202220-72553California855 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERICK ALFONSO VALLADARES, AKA No. 20-72553 Erick Alfonso Barrera Valladares, Agency No. A094-831-022 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE, CALLAHAN, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Erick Valladares (“Valladares”), a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (the “BIA”) dismissal of

his appeal and denial of his applications for cancellation of removal, withholding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 Our

jurisdiction is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.