Antelia Figueroa Barrera v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 202221-70988California963 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTELIA FIGUEROA BARRERA; KEVIN No. 21-70988

NIETO FIGUEROA,

Agency Nos. A206-911-229 Petitioners, A206-911-230

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 6, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: GILMAN,*** IKUTA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Antelia Figueroa Barrera and her son, Kevin Nieto Figueroa,

seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the denial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. of their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.