People v. Miaga CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2022H049219California377 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 6/17/22 P. v. Miaga CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H049219

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. C1919958)

v.

PAULJAN MICHAEL MIAGA,

Defendant and Appellant.

We resolve this case by memorandum opinion pursuant to California Standards of Judicial Administration, Title 8, Standard 8.1. (See also People v. Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 853–855.)

In December 2020, defendant pleaded no contest to a single-count felony complaint alleging a violation of Penal Code section 311.11, subdivision (c)(1). The complaint alleged defendant possessed more than 600 images of child pornography, at least 10 of which contained a prepubescent minor or a minor who had not attained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.