United States v. Stephanie Smith
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-55714
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01156-ODW-RAO v.
MEMORANDUM*
STEPHANIE SMITH,
Claimant-Appellant,
v.
$208,420.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 8, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Claimant-Appellant Stephanie Smith appeals from the district court’s order
denying her motion for reconsideration of her request for a stay of civil forfeiture
proceedings under 18 U.S.C. § 981(g)(2). We dismiss Smith’s appeal for lack of
jurisdiction.