Pedro Abarca v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 202218-72458California775 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 17 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PEDRO BUCIO ABARCA, No. 18-72458

Petitioner, Agency No. A087-749-599

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and SIMON,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. Pedro Bucio-Abarca (Bucio-Abarca), a citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) negative reasonable fear determination

and the IJ’s finding that Bucio-Abarca was not a credible witness. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.