Jose Aldana Sosa v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 202216-73875California798 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ROBERTO ALDANA SOSA, No. 16-73875

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-476-548

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jose Aldana Sosa seeks review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)

decision denying his application for withholding of removal, asylum, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We write for the parties and assume

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). their familiarity with the facts. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.