Usdoa

Jarrett Carson v. Usdoa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 202221-35938California564 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JARRETT CARSON; JOSEPH No. 21-35938

LAWENDOWSKI; JOHN DOE,

D.C. Nos. 3:15-cv-00071-JMK Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:15-cv-00072-JMK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

THE ARMY; CHRISTINE WORMUTH,

Secretary of the Army,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Joshua M. Kindred, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 7, 2022 Anchorage, Alaska

Before: HURWITZ, BRESS, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Jarrett Carson, Joseph Lawendowski, and John Doe (Plaintiffs-Appellants)

appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the United States Department of the

Army in this Privacy Act case. See 5 U.S.C. § 522a. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. The district court’s initial partial summary judgment decision did not

constitute law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.