Marefat

Marefat v. Dixon CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2022B312898California1,903 words

Opinion

Opinion

Willhite, J.

Filed 6/17/22 Marefat v. Dixon CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

KEN MAREFAT, B312898

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV08116) v.

NAVARRO DIXON et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Elaine Lu, Judge. Affirmed. EBL Law Group and Estefan M. Encarnación for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendants and Respondents. This lawsuit arose out of a residential lease agreement entered into by plaintiff Ken Marefat and defendants Navarro and Tanya Dixon. Plaintiff alleged defendants breached the agreement by making “numerous intermittent full and partial monthly payments of rent” to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.