Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Aluminum Precision Products CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 20, 2022B313833California3,215 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Filed 6/20/22 Gonzalez v. Aluminum Precision Products CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

MAIKEL GONZALEZ, 2d Civil No. B313833 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2020- Plaintiff and Respondent, 00546795-CU-OE-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

ALUMINUM PRECISION

PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent;

JOHN MALDONADO, JR.,

Movant and Appellant.

Appellant John Maldonado, Jr., appeals from two orders denying him leave to intervene in the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) action filed by respondent Maikel Gonzalez against respondent Aluminum Precision Products, Inc. (APP). (Lab. Code,1 § 2698 et seq.) He contends he

Further unspecified references are to the Labor Code. had a right to intervene in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.