United States v. Jack Coversup

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 202220-30266California355 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 21 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30266

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:19-cr-00015-SPW-1 v.

JACK PRESTON COVERSUP, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 9, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: IKUTA and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Jack Preston Coversup appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a

mistrial. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.