Samuel Acinelli, Jr. v. Ulysses Baniga
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 21 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SAMUEL ANTHONY ACINELLI, Jr., No. 19-15916
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:15-cv-01616-JDP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ULYSSES VILLAMIL BANIGA, Physician;
K. HILL,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
S. SHIESHA; P. NIXON, R.N.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jeremy D. Peterson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 17, 2022**
Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Samuel Anthony Acinelli appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment for prison officials in Acinelli’s civil rights action. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051,
1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.