Samuel Acinelli, Jr. v. Ulysses Baniga

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 202219-15916California476 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 21 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL ANTHONY ACINELLI, Jr., No. 19-15916

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:15-cv-01616-JDP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ULYSSES VILLAMIL BANIGA, Physician;

K. HILL,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

S. SHIESHA; P. NIXON, R.N.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jeremy D. Peterson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 17, 2022**

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Samuel Anthony Acinelli appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment for prison officials in Acinelli’s civil rights action. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051,

1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

Initially,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.