Thompson

Thompson v. Crestbrook Insurance CA1/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 2022A161949California6,979 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/21/22 Thompson v. Crestbrook Insurance CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

PETER THOMPSON et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants,

A161949

v. CRESTBROOK INSURANCE (Marin County COMPANY et al. Super. Ct. No. CIV 1904822) Defendants and Respondents.

Peter and Toni Thompson and Henstooth Ranch, LLC (collectively, the Thompsons) appeal a summary judgment in favor of Crestbrook Insurance Company (Crestbrook) and Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company (Nationwide) (collectively, the insurers) and Sander, Jacobs, Cassayre & Griffin, Inc. (the agent). The court held that the insurers had no duty to defend the Thompsons in an action involving a parcel they own in Sonoma County. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.