Roudi

Roudi v. Paydar CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 22, 2022D079405California489 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 6/22/22 Roudi v. Paydar CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ALEX ROUDI et al., D079405

Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants, and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. v. 37-2019-00070138-CU-PA-CTL)

REZA PAYDAR,

Defendant, Cross-complainant, and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Gregory W. Pollack, Judge. Reversed. Cooley, Steven M. Strauss and Erin Carey Trenda for Plaintiffs, Cross- defendants and Appellants Alex Roudi and Interwest Capital Corporation. Koning Zollar, Blake M. Zollar and Neal R. Gibeault for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant Interwest Capital Corporation. Williams Iagmin and Jon R. Williams; English & Gloven, Donald A. English and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.