Walter-Baldemar Martin-Perez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 202221-70320California944 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER-BALDEMAR MARTIN-PEREZ, No. 21-70320

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-151-677

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 10, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: IKUTA and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON,*** District Judge.

Walter-Baldemar Martin-Perez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions

for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. immigration judge’s decision finding him to be not credible and denying his

applications for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.