Rafiak Algzaly v. Anthony Blinken
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 202221-16375California786 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 22 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAFIAK MOHAMED ALGZALY; et al., No. 21-16375
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-03322-JCS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, as Secretary of State; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 9, 2022 Anchorage, Alaska
Before: HURWITZ, BRESS, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Rafiak Mohamed Algzaly, a United States citizen, and his sons, Hani Rafeq
Mohammed Alghazali and Gubran Rafeq Mohammed Alghazali, citizens of Yemen,
challenge the determination that Hani and Gubran are inadmissible under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1182(a)(6)(C)(i). The district court dismissed their constitutional claims as barred
under the doctrine of consular nonreviewability and denied, on the same grounds,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. leave to raise a claim under…